一、实验目的
- 能够独立部署RYU控制器;
- 能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;
- 能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。
二、实验环境
Ubuntu 20.04 Desktop amd64
三、实验要求
(一)基本要求
- 搭建下图所示SDN拓扑,协议使用Open Flow 1.0,并连接Ryu控制器,通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑。
- 阅读Ryu文档的The First Application一节,运行当中的L2Switch,h1 ping h2或h3,在目标主机使用 tcpdump 验证L2Switch,分析L2Switch和POX的Hub模块有何不同。
h1 ping h3
h1 ping h2
L2Switch.py代码
1 from ryu.base import app_manager 2 from ryu.controller import ofp_event 3 from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER 4 from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls 5 from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_0 6 7 class L2Switch(app_manager.RyuApp): 8 OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_0.OFP_VERSION] 9 10 def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): 11 super(L2Switch, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) 12 13 @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER) 14 def packet_in_handler(self, ev): 15 msg = ev.msg 16 dp = msg.datapath 17 ofp = dp.ofproto 18 ofp_parser = dp.ofproto_parser 19 20 actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofp.OFPP_FLOOD)] 21 22 data = None 23 if msg.buffer_id == ofp.OFP_NO_BUFFER: 24 data = msg.data 25 26 out = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut( 27 datapath=dp, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=msg.in_port, 28 actions=actions, data = data) 29 dp.send_msg(out)
L2Switch和POX的Hub模块的不同
Ryu中,L2Switch下发的流表无法查看;而POX中Hub则可以查看。
POX的Hub模块
- 编程修改L2Switch.py,另存为L212106668.py,使之和POX的Hub模块的变得一致?(xxxxxxxxx为学号)
1 from ryu.base import app_manager 2 from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3 3 from ryu.controller import ofp_event 4 from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER, CONFIG_DISPATCHER 5 from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls 6 7 class hub(app_manager.RyuApp): 8 OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION] 9 10 def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): 11 super(hub, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) 12 13 @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER) 14 def switch_feathers_handler(self, ev): 15 datapath = ev.msg.datapath 16 ofproto = datapath.ofproto 17 ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser 18 19 # install flow table-miss flow entry 20 match = ofp_parser.OFPMatch() 21 actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER, ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)] 22 # 1\OUTPUT PORT, 2\BUFF IN SWITCH? 23 self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions) 24 25 def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions): 26 # 1\ datapath for the switch, 2\priority for flow entry, 3\match field, 4\action for packet 27 ofproto = datapath.ofproto 28 ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser 29 # install flow 30 inst = [ofp_parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)] 31 mod = ofp_parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority, match=match, instructions=inst) 32 datapath.send_msg(mod) 33 34 @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER) 35 def packet_in_handler(self, ev): 36 msg = ev.msg 37 datapath = msg.datapath 38 ofproto = datapath.ofproto 39 ofp_parser = datapath.ofproto_parser 40 in_port = msg.match['in_port'] # get in port of the packet 41 42 # add a flow entry for the packet 43 match = ofp_parser.OFPMatch() 44 actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD)] 45 self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions) 46 47 # to output the current packet. for install rules only output later packets 48 out = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=in_port, actions=actions) 49 # buffer id: locate the buffered packet 50 datapath.send_msg(out)
(二)进阶要求
- 阅读Ryu关于simple_switch.py和simple_switch_1x.py的实现,以simple_switch_13.py为例,完成其代码的注释工作,
1 # Copyright (C) 2011 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation. 2 # 3 # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); 4 # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. 5 # You may obtain a copy of the License at 6 # 7 # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 8 # 9 # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software 10 # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, 11 # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or 12 # implied. 13 # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and 14 # limitations under the License. 15 16 from ryu.base import app_manager 17 from ryu.controller import ofp_event 18 from ryu.controller.handler import CONFIG_DISPATCHER, MAIN_DISPATCHER 19 from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls 20 from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3 21 from ryu.lib.packet import packet 22 from ryu.lib.packet import ethernet 23 from ryu.lib.packet import ether_types 24 25 26 class SimpleSwitch13(app_manager.RyuApp): # 继承 27 # 定义openflow版本 28 OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION] 29 30 def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): 31 super(SimpleSwitch13, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) # py2.7版本的书写方式 32 self.mac_to_port = {} # 用字典存储MAC地址表 33 34 35 # 监听事件,参数是事件名和状态 36 @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER) 37 # switch_features_handler函数是新增缺失流表项到流表中,当封包没有匹配到流表时,就触发packet_in 38 def switch_features_handler(self, ev): 39 datapath = ev.msg.datapath # datapath可认为是交换机n上发生的事 40 ofproto = datapath.ofproto # openflow协议的版本 41 parser = datapath.ofproto_parser # openflow协议的解析器 42 43 # install table-miss flow entry 44 # 45 # We specify NO BUFFER to max_len of the output action due to 46 # OVS bug. At this moment, if we specify a lesser number, e.g., 47 # 128, OVS will send Packet-In with invalid buffer_id and 48 # truncated packet data. In that case, we cannot output packets 49 # correctly. The bug has been fixed in OVS v2.1.0. 50 match = parser.OFPMatch() # 空的,为了匹配所有的封包 51 # actions是为了转送到控制器端口,参数里是发往控制器端口,不进行缓存 52 actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER, 53 ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)] 54 self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions) # 添加流表 55 56 def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions, buffer_id=None): 57 # 获取交换机信息 58 ofproto = datapath.ofproto 59 parser = datapath.ofproto_parser 60 61 # inst是instruction的缩写,第一个参数是马上执行动作,第二个参数是执行动作的对象 62 inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, 63 actions)] 64 # 判断是否存在buffer_id,并生成mod对象 65 if buffer_id: 66 mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=buffer_id, 67 priority=priority, match=match, 68 instructions=inst) 69 else: 70 mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority, 71 match=match, instructions=inst) 72 datapath.send_msg(mod) # 发送操作指令给交换机 73 74 75 # 监听packet_in消息是否被触发,用来处理未知目的地的封包 76 @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER) 77 def _packet_in_handler(self, ev): 78 # If you hit this you might want to increase 79 # the "miss_send_length" of your switch 80 if ev.msg.msg_len < ev.msg.total_len: 81 self.logger.debug("packet truncated: only %s of %s bytes", 82 ev.msg.msg_len, ev.msg.total_len) 83 msg = ev.msg 84 datapath = msg.datapath 85 ofproto = datapath.ofproto 86 parser = datapath.ofproto_parser 87 in_port = msg.match['in_port'] # 获取源端口 88 89 pkt = packet.Packet(msg.data) 90 eth = pkt.get_protocols(ethernet.ethernet)[0] 91 92 if eth.ethertype == ether_types.ETH_TYPE_LLDP: 93 # ignore lldp packet 94 return 95 dst = eth.dst # 获取目的端口 96 src = eth.src # 获取源端口 97 98 99 dpid = format(datapath.id, "d").zfill(16) # MAC地址表和每个交换机之间的识别,用dpid确认 100 self.mac_to_port.setdefault(dpid, {}) 101 102 # 打印日志信息 103 self.logger.info("packet in %s %s %s %s", dpid, src, dst, in_port) 104 105 # learn a mac address to avoid FLOOD next time. 106 self.mac_to_port[dpid][src] = in_port # 学习MAC地址,避免下次泛洪 107 108 if dst in self.mac_to_port[dpid]: # 如果目标Mac地址已经被学习了,决定哪个从哪个端口发送数据包,否则范洪 109 out_port = self.mac_to_port[dpid][dst] 110 else: 111 out_port = ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD 112 113 actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(out_port)] 114 115 # 下发流表避免下次触发 packet in 事件 116 # install a flow to avoid packet_in next time 117 if out_port != ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD: 118 match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst, eth_src=src) 119 # verify if we have a valid buffer_id, if yes avoid to send both 120 # flow_mod & packet_out 121 if msg.buffer_id != ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER: 122 self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions, msg.buffer_id) 123 return 124 else: 125 self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions) 126 data = None 127 if msg.buffer_id == ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER: 128 data = msg.data 129 # 构造一个pack_out消息然后发送 130 out = parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, 131 in_port=in_port, actions=actions, data=data) 132 datapath.send_msg(out)
a) 代码当中的mac_to_port的作用是什么?
保存mac地址到交换机端口的映射
b) simple_switch和simple_switch_13在dpid的输出上有何不同?
差别在于:simple_switch直接输出dpid,而simple_switch_13则在dpid前端填充0直至满16位
c) 相比simple_switch,simple_switch_13增加的switch_feature_handler实现了什么功能?
switch_features_handler函数是新增缺失流表项到流表中,当封包没有匹配到流表时,就触发packet_in
d) simple_switch_13是如何实现流规则下发的?
在接收到packetin事件后,首先获取包学习,交换机信息,以太网信息,协议信息等。若以太网类型是 LLDP类型,则不予处理。如果不是,则获取源端口的目的端口和交换机id,先学习源地址对应的交换机的入端口,再查看是否已经学习目的mac地址,如果没有则进行洪泛转发。如果学习过该mac地址,则查看是否有buffer_id,如果有的话,则在添加流表信息时加上buffer_id,向交换机发送流表。
e) switch_features_handler和_packet_in_handler两个事件在发送流规则的优先级上有何不同?switch_features_handler下发流表的优先级比_packet_in_handler的优先级高。
- 编程实现和ODL实验的一样的硬超时功能。
# Copyright (C) 2011 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation. # # Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); # you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. # You may obtain a copy of the License at # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or # implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. from ryu.base import app_manager from ryu.controller import ofp_event from ryu.controller.handler import CONFIG_DISPATCHER, MAIN_DISPATCHER from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3 from ryu.lib.packet import packet from ryu.lib.packet import ethernet from ryu.lib.packet import ether_types class SimpleSwitch13(app_manager.RyuApp): OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION] def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): super(SimpleSwitch13, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) self.mac_to_port = {} @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER) def switch_features_handler(self, ev): datapath = ev.msg.datapath ofproto = datapath.ofproto parser = datapath.ofproto_parser # install table-miss flow entry # # We specify NO BUFFER to max_len of the output action due to # OVS bug. At this moment, if we specify a lesser number, e.g., # 128, OVS will send Packet-In with invalid buffer_id and # truncated packet data. In that case, we cannot output packets # correctly. The bug has been fixed in OVS v2.1.0. match = parser.OFPMatch() actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER, ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)] self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions) def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions, buffer_id=None, hard_timeout=0): ofproto = datapath.ofproto parser = datapath.ofproto_parser inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, actions)] if buffer_id: mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=buffer_id, priority=priority, match=match, instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout) else: mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority, match=match, instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout) datapath.send_msg(mod) @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER) def _packet_in_handler(self, ev): # If you hit this you might want to increase # the "miss_send_length" of your switch if ev.msg.msg_len < ev.msg.total_len: self.logger.debug("packet truncated: only %s of %s bytes", ev.msg.msg_len, ev.msg.total_len) msg = ev.msg datapath = msg.datapath ofproto = datapath.ofproto parser = datapath.ofproto_parser in_port = msg.match['in_port'] pkt = packet.Packet(msg.data) eth = pkt.get_protocols(ethernet.ethernet)[0] if eth.ethertype == ether_types.ETH_TYPE_LLDP: # ignore lldp packet return dst = eth.dst src = eth.src dpid = format(datapath.id, "d").zfill(16) self.mac_to_port.setdefault(dpid, {}) self.logger.info("packet in %s %s %s %s", dpid, src, dst, in_port) # learn a mac address to avoid FLOOD next time. self.mac_to_port[dpid][src] = in_port if dst in self.mac_to_port[dpid]: out_port = self.mac_to_port[dpid][dst] else: out_port = ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(out_port)]\ actions_timeout=[] # install a flow to avoid packet_in next time if out_port != ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD: match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst, eth_src=src) # verify if we have a valid buffer_id, if yes avoid to send both # flow_mod & packet_out hard_timeout=10 if msg.buffer_id != ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER: self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match,actions_timeout, msg.buffer_id,hard_timeout=10) self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions, msg.buffer_id) return else: self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match, actions_timeout, hard_timeout=10) self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions) data = None if msg.buffer_id == ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER: data = msg.data out = parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=in_port, actions=actions, data=data) datapath.send_msg(out)
(三)个人总结
在实验过程中,我做第二题的时候执行ryu-manager L2Switch.py一直报错不能执行,然后重启虚拟机后可以执行,发现应该是原先执行的ryu-manager ryu/ryu/app/gui_topology/gui_topology.py --observe-links这条命令没有退出。对比上次实验这回不用一直清除上一条拓扑,直接新建就可以了方便不少。通过本次实验我能够部署RYU控制器,顺利打开ryu的可视化图形界面,此外也进一步熟悉了之前tcpdump命令的用法,还了解到Hub和L2Switch的区别就在于下发流表是否可以查看,希望可以在之后的实验中能够更加深入地理解到它们的区别。
标签:控制器,self,parser,datapath,msg,开源,ofproto,RYU,port From: https://www.cnblogs.com/huang0724/p/16837386.html