In Cursor IDE, which one is better to process the above job, composer normal mode or agent mode?

For processing a large-scale documentation organization task, Agent mode is better than Composer mode in Cursor IDE. Here's why:

Agent Mode Advantages:

1. Tool Integration

   • Direct access to all 8 agent tools:

   - list_dir
   - codebase_search
   - read_file
   - run_terminal_command
   - grep_search
   - file_search
   - edit_file
   - delete_file
   

2. Context Awareness

   • Maintains context across multiple operations
   • Better understanding of project structure
   • Can handle complex, multi-step tasks

3. Batch Operations

   # Example of multi-step operation in Agent mode
   /list_dir docs/
   /search "API documentation"
   /edit docs/api/README.md
   

4. Project-Wide Analysis

   • Can analyze entire codebase
   • Better at finding relationships between documents
   • More effective at organizing content

Composer Mode Limitations:

1. Limited to single-file focus
2. Less context awareness
3. No direct access to project-wide tools
4. Better suited for:
   • Single file edits
   • Code completion
   • Simple documentation tasks

Recommended Workflow in Agent Mode:

1. Initial Analysis

# Scan project structure
/list_dir .

# Find existing documentation
/search "\.md$"

2. Content Organization

# Create directory structure
/run mkdir -p docs/{api,guides,tutorials,reference}

# Move existing docs
/run mv *.md docs/

3. Documentation Processing

# Search for specific content
/grep "API|Function|Class" docs/

# Edit documentation files
/edit docs/SUMMARY.md

4. Quality Control

# Run documentation tools
/run npm run docs:lint
/run markdownlint docs/**/*.md

Therefore, for your knowledge base generation task, use Agent mode because:

• More powerful toolset
• Better project-wide context
• Efficient batch operations
• Maintains task context
• Better suited for complex documentation tasks

Would you like specific examples of how to use Agent mode for any particular aspect of your documentation task?