首页 > 其他分享 >实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU

实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU

时间:2022-10-28 23:23:23浏览次数:43  
标签:控制器 self parser datapath ofproto 开源 msg RYU id

(一)基本要求
1、搭建下图所示SDN拓扑,协议使用Open Flow 1.0,并连接Ryu控制器,通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑。



2、阅读Ryu文档的The First Application一节,运行当中的L2Switch,h1 ping h2或h3,在目标主机使用 tcpdump 验证L2Switch,分析L2Switch和POX的Hub模块有何不同。

点击查看代码
from ryu.base import app_manager
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_0

class L2Switch(app_manager.RyuApp):
	OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_0.OFP_VERSION]

	def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
		super(L2Switch, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)

	@set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
	def packet_in_handler(self, ev):
		msg = ev.msg
		dp = msg.datapath
		ofp = dp.ofproto
		ofp_parser = dp.ofproto_parser

		actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofp.OFPP_FLOOD)]

		data = None
		if msg.buffer_id == ofp.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
			data = msg.data

		out = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut(
			datapath=dp, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=msg.in_port,
			actions=actions, data = data)
		dp.send_msg(out)







L2Switch和POX的Hub模块的不同:
相同之处在于二者实现的都是洪泛发送ICMP报文,所以在h1去pingh2时,h2和h3可以看到都有抓到数据包。
不同之处在于:Ryu中L2Switch下发的流表是无法查看的,而POX中Hub模块可以查看。
3、编程修改L2Switch.py,另存为L2xxxxxxxxx.py,使之和POX的Hub模块的变得一致?(xxxxxxxxx为学号)

点击查看代码
from ryu.base import app_manager
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import CONFIG_DISPATCHER, MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_0

class L2Switch(app_manager.RyuApp):
    OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_0.OFP_VERSION]

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(L2Switch, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)

    @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER)
    def switch_features_handler(self, ev):
        datapath = ev.msg.datapath
        ofproto = datapath.ofproto
        parser = datapath.ofproto_parser

        # install table-miss flow entry
        #
        # We specify NO BUFFER to max_len of the output action due to
        # OVS bug. At this moment, if we specify a lesser number, e.g.,
        # 128, OVS will send Packet-In with invalid buffer_id and
        # truncated packet data. In that case, we cannot output packets
        # correctly.  The bug has been fixed in OVS v2.1.0.
        match = parser.OFPMatch()
        actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER,
                                          ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)]
        self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions)

    def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions, buffer_id=None):
        ofproto = datapath.ofproto
        parser = datapath.ofproto_parser

        inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
                                             actions)]
        if buffer_id:
            mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=buffer_id,
                                    priority=priority, match=match,
                                    instructions=inst)
        else:
            mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority,
                                    match=match, instructions=inst)
        datapath.send_msg(mod)

    @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
    def packet_in_handler(self, ev):
        msg = ev.msg
        dp = msg.datapath
        ofp = dp.ofproto
        ofp_parser = dp.ofproto_parser
        in_port = msg.match['in_port']

        actions = [ofp_parser.OFPActionOutput(ofp.OFPP_FLOOD)]

        data = None
        if msg.buffer_id == ofp.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
             data = msg.data

        out = ofp_parser.OFPPacketOut(
            datapath=dp, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id, in_port=in_port,
            actions=actions, data = data)
        dp.send_msg(out)





(二)进阶要求
1、阅读Ryu关于simple_switch.py和simple_switch_1x.py的实现,以simple_switch_13.py为例,完成其代码的注释工作,并回答下列问题:
a) 代码当中的mac_to_port的作用是什么?
答:保存mac地址到交换机端口的映射
b) simple_switch和simple_switch_13在dpid的输出上有何不同?
simple_switch

dpid = datapath.id
self.mac_to_port.setdefault(dpid, {})
self.logger.info("packet in %s %s %s %s", dpid, src, dst, msg.in_port)

simple_switch_13

c) 相比simple_switch,simple_switch_13增加的switch_feature_handler实现了什么功能?
实现了交换机以特性应答消息来响应特性请求的功能
d) simple_switch_13是如何实现流规则下发的?
在接收到packetin事件后,首先获取包学习,交换机信息,以太网信息,协议信息等。
如果以太网类型是LLDP类型,则不予处理。
如果不是,则获取源端口目的端口,以及交换机id,先学习源地址对应的交换机的入端口,再查看是否已经学习目的mac地址,如果没有则进行洪泛转发。
如果学习过该mac地址,则查看是否有buffer_id,如果有的话,则在添加流动作时加上buffer_id,向交换机发送流表。
e) switch_features_handler和_packet_in_handler两个事件在发送流规则的优先级上有何不同?
switch_features_handler下发流表的优先级更高
2、编程实现和ODL实验的一样的硬超时功能。

点击查看代码
# Copyright (C) 2011 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
#    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
# implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.

from ryu.base import app_manager
from ryu.controller import ofp_event
from ryu.controller.handler import CONFIG_DISPATCHER, MAIN_DISPATCHER
from ryu.controller.handler import set_ev_cls
from ryu.ofproto import ofproto_v1_3
from ryu.lib.packet import packet
from ryu.lib.packet import ethernet
from ryu.lib.packet import ether_types


class SimpleSwitch13(app_manager.RyuApp):
    OFP_VERSIONS = [ofproto_v1_3.OFP_VERSION]

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super(SimpleSwitch13, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        self.mac_to_port = {}

    @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPSwitchFeatures, CONFIG_DISPATCHER)
    def switch_features_handler(self, ev):
        datapath = ev.msg.datapath
        ofproto = datapath.ofproto
        parser = datapath.ofproto_parser

        # install table-miss flow entry
        #
        # We specify NO BUFFER to max_len of the output action due to
        # OVS bug. At this moment, if we specify a lesser number, e.g.,
        # 128, OVS will send Packet-In with invalid buffer_id and
        # truncated packet data. In that case, we cannot output packets
        # correctly.  The bug has been fixed in OVS v2.1.0.
        match = parser.OFPMatch()
        actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(ofproto.OFPP_CONTROLLER,
                                          ofproto.OFPCML_NO_BUFFER)]
        self.add_flow(datapath, 0, match, actions)

    def add_flow(self, datapath, priority, match, actions, buffer_id=None, hard_timeout=0):
        ofproto = datapath.ofproto
        parser = datapath.ofproto_parser

        inst = [parser.OFPInstructionActions(ofproto.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
                                             actions)]
        if buffer_id:
            mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=buffer_id,
                                    priority=priority, match=match,
                                    instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout)
        else:
            mod = parser.OFPFlowMod(datapath=datapath, priority=priority,
                                    match=match, instructions=inst, hard_timeout=hard_timeout)
        datapath.send_msg(mod)

    @set_ev_cls(ofp_event.EventOFPPacketIn, MAIN_DISPATCHER)
    def _packet_in_handler(self, ev):
        # If you hit this you might want to increase
        # the "miss_send_length" of your switch
        if ev.msg.msg_len < ev.msg.total_len:
            self.logger.debug("packet truncated: only %s of %s bytes",
                              ev.msg.msg_len, ev.msg.total_len)
        msg = ev.msg
        datapath = msg.datapath
        ofproto = datapath.ofproto
        parser = datapath.ofproto_parser
        in_port = msg.match['in_port']

        pkt = packet.Packet(msg.data)
        eth = pkt.get_protocols(ethernet.ethernet)[0]

        if eth.ethertype == ether_types.ETH_TYPE_LLDP:
            # ignore lldp packet
            return
        dst = eth.dst
        src = eth.src

        dpid = format(datapath.id, "d").zfill(16)
        self.mac_to_port.setdefault(dpid, {})

        self.logger.info("packet in %s %s %s %s", dpid, src, dst, in_port)

        # learn a mac address to avoid FLOOD next time.
        self.mac_to_port[dpid][src] = in_port

        if dst in self.mac_to_port[dpid]:
            out_port = self.mac_to_port[dpid][dst]
        else:
            out_port = ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD

        actions = [parser.OFPActionOutput(out_port)]\

        actions_timeout=[]

        # install a flow to avoid packet_in next time
        if out_port != ofproto.OFPP_FLOOD:
            match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst, eth_src=src)
            # verify if we have a valid buffer_id, if yes avoid to send both
            # flow_mod & packet_out
            hard_timeout=10 #实现硬超时功能
            if msg.buffer_id != ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
                self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match,actions_timeout, msg.buffer_id,hard_timeout=10)
                self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions, msg.buffer_id)
                return
            else:
                self.add_flow(datapath, 2, match, actions_timeout, hard_timeout=10)
                self.add_flow(datapath, 1, match, actions)
        data = None
        if msg.buffer_id == ofproto.OFP_NO_BUFFER:
            data = msg.data

        out = parser.OFPPacketOut(datapath=datapath, buffer_id=msg.buffer_id,
                                  in_port=in_port, actions=actions, data=data)
        datapath.send_msg(out)

三、个人总结
经过这次实验,我学会了部署RYU控制器;能够浅浅地理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;能够勉强理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。在进阶里我看了许多代码和上网查找这些代码什么意思。让我更了解ryu的原理。在实验之中,我遇到很多问题。
1、
这个问题我上网和问同学,最后才知道是我的代码缩进没有统一,然后规范了一下缩进就好了。
2、我用ryu-manage命令时,他出现了报错Command 'ryu-manager' not found, but can be installed with:sudo apt install python3-ryu
然后我按照他的命令sudo apt install python3-ryu下载了,去212006112/ryu/ryu里运行ryu-manage L2Switch.py就好了。

标签:控制器,self,parser,datapath,ofproto,开源,msg,RYU,id
From: https://www.cnblogs.com/jiwenyun/p/16837808.html

相关文章

  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    (一)基本要求1.搭建所示SDN拓扑,协议使用OpenFlow1.0,并连接Ryu控制器,通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑。构建拓扑sudomn--topo=single,3--mac--controller=remote,ip......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    一、实验目的能够独立部署RYU控制器;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。二、实验环境Ubuntu20.04Desktopamd6......
  • 开源Linux拥抱车载娱乐系统
    AppleCarPlay和AndroidAuto已经开始角力争夺车载娱乐系统市场,而现在开源Linux在也开始在该领域中发力。AutoMotiveGradeLinux(AGL)项目宣布UnifiedCodeBase2.0,致力于......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU一、实验目的能够独立部署RYU控制器;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。二、实验......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    基本要求搭建下图所示SDN拓扑,协议使用OpenFlow1.0,并连接Ryu控制器,通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑。生成拓扑sudomn--topo=single,3--controller=remote,ip=127.......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU一、实验目的能够独立部署RYU控制器;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。二、实验......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU一、实验目的能够独立部署RYU控制器;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。二、实验环......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU一、实验目的能够独立部署RYU控制器;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。二、实验......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    (一)基本要求1.搭建下图所示SDN拓扑,协议使用OpenFlow1.0,并连接Ryu控制器,通过Ryu的图形界面查看网络拓扑。启动RYU控制器ryu-manager../ryu/ryu/app/gui_topology/gui_t......
  • 实验6:开源控制器实践——RYU
    一、实验目的能够独立部署RYU控制器;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的集线器原理;能够理解RYU控制器实现软件定义的交换机原理。二、实验环境Ubuntu20.04Desktopamd6......