MySQL在5.6版本推出了GTID复制,相比传统的复制,GTID复制对于运维更加友好,这个事物是谁产生,产生多少事物,非常直接的标识出来。
今天将讨论一下 关于从库show slave status 中的Retrieved_Gtid_Set 和 Executed_Gtid_Set.
Retrieved_Gtid_Set : 从库已经接收到主库的事务编号
Executed_Gtid_Set : 从库自身已经执行的事务编号
下面将解释这两列的含义:
首先看看master和slave的server-uuid
Master:
[root@localhost][db1]> show variables like '%uuid%';
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| server_uuid | 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Slave
[root@localhost][(none)]> show variables like '%uuid%';
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
| server_uuid | 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab |
+---------------+--------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
其中主库的server-id是10,从库的server-id是20.
搭建好主从以后,如果没有数据写入,那么show slave status是下面这样的:
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
Master_Server_Id: 10
Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set:
Executed_Gtid_Set:
Auto_Position: 1
Replicate_Rewrite_DB:
Channel_Name:
Master_TLS_Version:
如果在主库创建表,并且写入2条数据,是下面这样的:
[root@localhost][db1]> create table t2 ( id int);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.07 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 1;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.07 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 2;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
这里auto_commit=1,可以看到创建表加插入2条数据,一共执行了3个事务.
从库:show slave status\G
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
Master_Server_Id: 10
Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
Auto_Position: 1
主库:show master status
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
| mysql-bin.000001 | 912 | | | 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3 |
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
其中主库的 Executed_Gtid_Set为:2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
看到从库的Retrieved_Gtid_Set为: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
Executed_Gtid_Set为: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
也就是说主库产生了3个事务,从库接收到了主库的3个事务,且都已全部执行。
其中 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb 是主库的server-uuid. 可以从从库解析binlog看出:
# at 154
#170823 0:38:38 server id 10 end_log_pos 219 CRC32 0x6268641f GTID last_committed=0 sequence_number=1
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1'/*!*/;
# at 219
#170823 0:38:38 server id 10 end_log_pos 316 CRC32 0x6c837618 Query thread_id=103 exec_time=0 error_code=0
use `db1`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1503419918/*!*/;
SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=103/*!*/;
SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1/*!*/;
SET @@session.sql_mode=1436549152/*!*/;
SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1/*!*/;
/*!\C utf8 *//*!*/;
SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=33/*!*/;
SET @@session.lc_time_names=0/*!*/;
SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT/*!*/;
create table t2 ( id int)
/*!*/;
可以看见server-id为10,gtid-next为2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1,执行了建表,剩下的
2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:2 与 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:3 执行的查询我没有写出来。
这里也体现了文章开始提到的:这个事物由谁产生,产生多少事物,非常直接的标识了出来。
那么对于文章开头那个诡异的gtid是怎么出来的呢?先说说已经执行的事务:
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-33,
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1
这里的2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-33好理解,就是已经执行主库的1-33的事务,那么8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1呢?其实也简单,有两种情况:
NO.1 从库有数据写入(即从库插入数据)
[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 1;
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
show slave status\G;
Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
Master_Server_Id: 10
Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1
Auto_Position: 1
Replicate_Rewrite_DB:
可以看到已经执行的事务有来自主库的2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,也有从库自己写入的数据:8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1。我们可以解析binlog看看
mysqlbinlog -vv mysql-bin.000001 --include-gtids='8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1'
# at 896
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 961 CRC32 0x0492528a GTID last_committed=3 sequence_number=4
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1'/*!*/;
# at 961
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1032 CRC32 0xbf545cca Query thread_id=25 exec_time=0 error_code=0
SET TIMESTAMP=1503421159/*!*/;
SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=25/*!*/;
SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1/*!*/;
SET @@session.sql_mode=1436549152/*!*/;
SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1/*!*/;
/*!\C utf8 *//*!*/;
SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=33/*!*/;
SET @@session.lc_time_names=0/*!*/;
SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT/*!*/;
BEGIN
/*!*/;
# at 1032
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1079 CRC32 0x2f2de3ec Rows_query
# insert into t2 select 1
# at 1079
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1123 CRC32 0x18fe1c5c Table_map: `db1`.`t2` mapped to number 109
# at 1123
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1163 CRC32 0x163a708e Write_rows: table id 109 flags: STMT_END_F
BINLOG '
52KcWR0UAAAALwAAADcEAACAABdpbnNlcnQgaW50byB0MiBzZWxlY3QgMezjLS8=
52KcWRMUAAAALAAAAGMEAAAAAG0AAAAAAAEAA2RiMQACdDIAAQMAAVwc/hg=
52KcWR4UAAAAKAAAAIsEAAAAAG0AAAAAAAEAAgAB//4BAAAAjnA6Fg==
'/*!*/;
### INSERT INTO `db1`.`t2`
### SET
### @1=1 /* INT meta=0 nullable=1 is_null=0 */
# at 1163
#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1194 CRC32 0xe3347ac1 Xid = 68
COMMIT/*!*/;
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= 'AUTOMATIC' /* added by mysqlbinlog */ /*!*/;
从binlog中可以清楚看到是从库进行了写入。
NO.2 主从切换(这里使用的是MHA切换主从)
Master_Server_Id: 20
Master_UUID: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1
Auto_Position: 1
可以看到主从切换以后主库的server-id是20。这里的意思是接收到主库8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1,并已经执行了这个事物,这个事物其实就是之前从库写入的那条数据。对于2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3就是之前主库执行的3个事务,如果此时在主库再插入一条数据,那么变化如下:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-2
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-2
下面说说GTID不连续问题,类似 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:37-45 ,这个是由于binlog被清理后导致的,我们可以测试一下,然后查看gtid_purge变量。
binlog不可能永远驻留在服务上,需要定期进行清理(通过expire_logs_days可以控制定期清理间隔),否则迟早它会把磁盘用尽。gtid_purged用于记录已经被清除了的binlog事务集合,它是gtid_executed的子集。只有gtid_executed为空时才能手动设置该变量,此时会同时更新gtid_executed为和gtid_purged相同的值。gtid_executed为空意味着要么之前没有启动过基于GTID的复制,要么执行过RESET MASTER。执行RESET MASTER时同样也会把gtid_purged置空,即始终保持gtid_purged是gtid_executed的子集。
[root@localhost][db1]> show master logs;
+------------------+-----------+
| Log_name | File_size |
+------------------+-----------+
| mysql-bin.000001 | 3530 |
+------------------+-----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> flush logs;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> show master logs;
+------------------+-----------+
| Log_name | File_size |
+------------------+-----------+
| mysql-bin.000001 | 3577 |
| mysql-bin.000002 | 234 |
+------------------+-----------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> PURGE BINARY LOGS TO 'mysql-bin.000002';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
[root@localhost][db1]> show master logs;
+------------------+-----------+
| Log_name | File_size |
+------------------+-----------+
| mysql-bin.000002 | 234 |
+------------------+-----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
然后只要从库有重新启动,才会读取。MySQL服务器启动时,通过读binlog文件,初始化gtid_executed和gtid_purged,使它们的值能和上次MySQL运行时一致。
gtid_executed 本机被执行并写入日志的gtid
gtid_purged 该变量中记录的是本机上已经执行过,但是已经被purge binary logs to命令清理的gtid_set
没启动前:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9
重启并插入数据:
Master_Server_Id: 20
Master_UUID: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab
Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
Master_Retry_Count: 86400
Master_Bind:
Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:
Master_SSL_Crl:
Master_SSL_Crlpath:
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:10
Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-10
Auto_Position: 1
[root@localhost][(none)]> show variables like 'gtid_purged';
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| gtid_purged | 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,
8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9 |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
可以看到 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3 与 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9 都在mysql-bin.000001里,已经被清除了。
下面的两个实验,将会告诉我们如果主日志被清除,但从还没获得这些日志,该怎么处理:
实验一:如果slave所需要事务对应的GTID在master上已经被purge了
根据show global variables like '%gtid%'的命令结果我们可以看到,和GTID相关的变量中有一个gtid_purged。从字面意思以及 官方文档可以知道该变量中记录的是本机上已经执行过,但是已经被purge binary logs to命令清理的gtid_set。
本节中我们就要试验下,如果master上把某些slave还没有fetch到的gtid event purge后会有什么样的结果。
以下指令在master上执行
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';
+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF |
| enforce_gtid_consistency | ON |
| gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 |
| gtid_mode | ON |
| gtid_owned | |
| gtid_purged | |
| simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |
+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
7 rows in set (0.01 sec)
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > flush logs;create table gtid_test2 (ID int) engine=innodb;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > flush logs;create table gtid_test3 (ID int) engine=innodb;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show master status;
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
| mysql-bin.000005 | 359 | | | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 |
+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > purge binary logs to 'mysql-bin.000004';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';
+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF |
| enforce_gtid_consistency | ON |
| gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 |
| gtid_mode | ON |
| gtid_owned | |
| gtid_purged | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 |
| simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
在slave2上重新做一次主从,以下命令在slave2上执行
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > change master to master_host='127.0.0.1',master_port =21288,master_user='rsandbox',master_password='rsandbox',master_auto_position=1;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 2 warnings (0.04 sec)
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > show slave status\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
......
Slave_IO_Running: No
Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
......
Last_Errno: 0
Last_Error:
Skip_Counter: 0
Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 0
Relay_Log_Space: 151
......
Last_IO_Errno: 1236
Last_IO_Error: Got fatal error 1236 from master when reading data from binary log: 'The slave is connecting using CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_AUTO_POSITION = 1, but the master has purged binary logs containing GTIDs that the slave requires.'
Last_SQL_Errno: 0
Last_SQL_Error:
......
Auto_Position: 1
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
实验二:忽略purged的部分,强行同步
那么实际生产应用当中,偶尔会遇到这样的情况:某个slave从备份恢复后(或者load data infile)后,DBA可以人为保证该slave数据和master一致;或者即使不一致,这些差异也不会导致今后的主从异常(例如:所有master上只有insert没有update)。这样的前提下,我们又想使slave通过replication从master进行数据复制。此时我们就需要跳过master已经被purge的部分,那么实际该如何操作呢?
我们还是以实验一的情况为例:
先确认master上已经purge的部分。从下面的命令结果可以知道master上已经缺失24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1这一条事务的相关日志
master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';
+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF |
| enforce_gtid_consistency | ON |
| gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 |
| gtid_mode | ON |
| gtid_owned | |
| gtid_purged | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 |
| simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
在slave上通过set global gtid_purged='xxxx'的方式,跳过已经purge的部分
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > stop slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > set global gtid_purged = '24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > show slave status\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
......
Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005
Read_Master_Log_Pos: 359
Relay_Log_File: mysql_sandbox21290-relay-bin.000004
Relay_Log_Pos: 569
Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005
Slave_IO_Running: Yes
Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
......
Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 359
Relay_Log_Space: 873
......
Master_Server_Id: 1
Master_UUID: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b
Master_Info_File: /data/mysql/rsandbox_mysql-5_6_23/node2/data/master.info
SQL_Delay: 0
SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O thread to update it
......
Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:2-3
Executed_Gtid_Set: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3
Auto_Position: 1
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
可以看到此时slave已经可以正常同步,并补齐了24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:2-3范围的binlog日志。
转载来自原文作者地址:https://blog.csdn.net/woailyoo0000/article/details/88981380
标签:sec,2a09ee6e,详解,Master,GTID,MySQL,master,11e7,gtid From: https://www.cnblogs.com/hgboy/p/18334619