首页 > 数据库 >独家揭秘丨GreatSQL 没开Binlog时多线程插入数据性能劣化之谜

独家揭秘丨GreatSQL 没开Binlog时多线程插入数据性能劣化之谜

时间:2024-07-19 09:41:23浏览次数:8  
标签:Binlog insert lock t1 GreatSQL ins mysqld 多线程 row

一、问题发现

在一次数据迁移中,用到了INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t2这样的 SQL 用来搬迁大表,为了提高插入效率关闭了Binlog,考虑用多线程来插入提高速度。表的类型信息和插入效率如下所示。

测试环境:

  • Linux node-76-11 4.19.90-17.ky10.aarch64,128核CPU,512G内存。

GreatSQL参数配置如下(为降低 I/O 因素影响,关闭 Binlog):

#**********************Performance*********************
#******connect
max_connections=10000
max_connect_errors=1000000
open_files_limit=65535
back_log=1500
table_definition_cache=10000
thread_stack=256K
thread_cache_size=3000

#******session
sort_buffer_size=4M
join_buffer_size=4M
read_buffer_size=4M
read_rnd_buffer_size=4M
bulk_insert_buffer_size=64M
tmp_table_size=64M
max_heap_table_size=64M
net_buffer_length=16K
max_allowed_packet=1G

#******timeout
lock_wait_timeout=600
connect_timeout=10
interactive_timeout=31536000
wait_timeout=31536000
net_read_timeout=86400
net_write_timeout=86400
net_retry_count=10
#**********************InnoDB**************************
transaction_isolation=READ-COMMITTED
innodb_buffer_pool_size=200G
innodb_buffer_pool_instances=16
innodb_max_dirty_pages_pct=90
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=0
innodb_log_buffer_size=1G
innodb_page_cleaners=8
innodb_buffer_pool_dump_at_shutdown=ON
innodb_buffer_pool_load_at_startup=ON
innodb_buffer_pool_dump_pct=100
innodb_checksum_algorithm=NONE
innodb_log_checksums=NO
innodb_undo_log_truncate=OFF
innodb_change_buffering = none
innodb_spin_wait_delay=6
innodb_spin_wait_pause_multiplier=50
innodb_sync_spin_loops=30
#******feature
innodb_open_files=65535
innodb_flush_method=O_DIRECT
innodb_flush_neighbors=0
innodb_flush_sync=ON
innodb_io_capacity=20000
innodb_io_capacity_max=40000
innodb_lru_scan_depth=9000
innodb_lock_wait_timeout=30
innodb_print_all_deadlocks=ON
innodb_online_alter_log_max_size=4G
innodb_thread_concurrency=0
innodb_read_io_threads=32
innodb_write_io_threads=32
innodb_doublewrite=ON
innodb_doublewrite_pages=64
innodb_adaptive_hash_index=OFF
innodb_status_file=OFF

1、窄表 + 有自增主键

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t1 (
  c1 int invisible auto_increment primary key,
  c2 int,
  str1 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str2 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str3 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str4 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL
) engine=InnoDB;

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t2 LIKE t1;

行平均长度约 30 字节

行数 插入sql 线程数 总用时 解释
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 单线程 1 min 46.47 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 1 min 15.45 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 55.74 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 45.34 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 16 43.78 sec 最佳
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 1 min 11.62 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 1 min 2.53 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 1 min 0.55 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 16 55.46 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 1 min 24.13 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 1 min 14.43 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 1 min 10.64 sec

2、中等宽度表 + 有自增主键

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t1 (
  c1 int invisible auto_increment primary key,
  c2 int,
  str1 varchar(512) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT(repeat('a',512)) NOT NULL
) engine=InnoDB;

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t2 LIKE t1;

行平均长度约 500多字节

行数 插入sql 线程数 总用时 解释
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 单线程 4 min 30.41 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 4 min 36.58 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 4 min 46.58 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 4 min 50.43 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 4 min 26.28 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 4 min 38.84 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 4 min 49.42 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 4 min 25.67 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 4 min 40.42 sec 效率无提升
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 4 min 46.70 sec 效率无提升

3、宽表 + 有自增主键

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t1 (
  c1 int invisible auto_increment primary key,
  c2 int,
  str1 varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT(repeat('a1',512)) NOT NULL,
  str2 varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT(repeat('b2',512)) NOT NULL,
  str3 varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT(repeat('c3',512)) NOT NULL,
  str4 varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET latin1 DEFAULT(repeat('c3',512)) NOT NULL
) engine=InnoDB;

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t2 LIKE t1;

行平均长度约 5000多字节

行数 插入sql 线程数 总用时/s 解释
100万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 单线程 4 min 32.90 sec
100万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 4 min 52.36 sec 性能劣化
100万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 4 min 52.31 sec 性能劣化
100万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 5 min 36.07 sec 性能劣化
100万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 4 min 48.34 sec 性能劣化

4、窄表 + 无主键(GIPK关)

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t1 (
  c1 int invisible auto_increment primary key,
  c2 int,
  str1 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str2 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str3 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str4 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL
) engine=InnoDB;

greatsql> CREATE TABLE t2 (
  c2 int,
  str1 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str2 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str3 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL,
  str4 int DEFAULT(100) NOT NULL
) engine=InnoDB;

行平均宽度约 30 字节,没用 GIPKs 特性

行数 插入sql 线程数 总用时 解释
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 单线程 1 min 29.08 sec
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 1 min 38.84 sec 性能劣化
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 2 min 18.88 sec 性能劣化
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 2 min 14.51 sec 性能劣化
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 2 1 min 35.96 sec 性能劣化
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 6 2 min 3.55 sec 性能劣化
1000万行 insert into t2 select * from t1; 10 2 min 1.52 sec 性能劣化

5、结论

从上面的测试结果可以看出,无主键表并发插入劣化严重,有主键的情况下,窄表的并发性能提升效果好,但是对于宽表反而会造成劣化。

二、问题调查过程

1、首先调查无主键的情况下长数据造成性能劣化的情况。用perf查看造成性能劣化的瓶颈在哪里。

+   12.55%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock
+   12.34%     0.13%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] x64_sys_call
+   12.03%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::mtr_add_page
+   11.92%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] btr_cur_ins_lock_and_undo
+   11.27%     0.19%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] __x64_sys_futex
-   11.18%    11.11%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ut_delay
     10.89% start_thread
        pfs_spawn_thread
        handle_connection
        do_command
        dispatch_command
        dispatch_sql_command                                                                           
        mysql_execute_command
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute_inner 
        Query_expression::execute  
      - Query_expression::ExecuteIteratorQuery 
         - 10.75% Query_result_insert::send_data 
              write_record         
              handler::ha_write_row            
              ha_innobase::write_row           
              row_insert_for_mysql 
              row_insert_for_mysql_using_ins_graph 
              row_ins_step         
              row_ins              
              row_ins_index_entry_step         
              row_ins_index_entry  
              row_ins_clust_index_entry        
            - row_ins_clust_index_entry_low    
               - 10.16% btr_pcur_t::open       
                  - btr_cur_search_to_nth_level  
                     - 10.10% buf_page_get_gen 
                        - 10.08% Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::single_page 
                           - 10.07% Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::mtr_add_page 
                                rw_lock_x_lock_gen 
                              - pfs_rw_lock_x_lock_func                   
                                 - 10.07% rw_lock_x_lock_func             
                                      ut_delay 
+   11.08%     0.21%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] do_futex          
+   10.90%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] rw_lock_x_lock_func   
+   10.90%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] pfs_rw_lock_x_lock_func 
+   10.90%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] rw_lock_x_lock_gen   
+    9.44%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] locksys::owns_page_shard 
+    9.39%     0.05%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] locksys::Latches::owns_page_shard 
+    9.29%     0.64%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::trylock 
+    7.66%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] locksys::rec_queue_latch_and_validate 
+    7.65%     0.17%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] rw_lock_debug_mutex_exit 
+    7.39%     0.07%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] trx_undo_report_row_operation     
+    7.17%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_pool_validate_instance        
+    7.17%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_validate      
-    6.63%     5.87%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] unlikely          
   - 5.84% start_thread            
        pfs_spawn_thread           
        handle_connection          
        do_command                 
        dispatch_command           
        dispatch_sql_command       
        mysql_execute_command      
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute       
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute_inner 
        Query_expression::execute  
      - Query_expression::ExecuteIteratorQuery 
         - 4.44% Query_result_insert::send_data  
              write_record         
              handler::ha_write_row            
              ha_innobase::write_row           
            - row_insert_for_mysql 
               - 4.43% row_insert_for_mysql_using_ins_graph               
                  - 4.42% row_ins_step         
                     - 4.41% row_ins           
                        - 4.41% row_ins_index_entry_step                  
                           - 4.35% row_ins_index_entry                    
                                row_ins_clust_index_entry                 
                              - row_ins_clust_index_entry_low             
                                 - 1.89% btr_pcur_t::open                 
                                    - btr_cur_search_to_nth_level         
                                       - 1.08% page_cur_search_with_match 
                                            0.52% dtuple_t::compare       
                                 - 1.87% btr_cur_optimistic_insert        
                                      1.13% page_cur_tuple_insert         
                                      0.56% btr_cur_ins_lock_and_undo     
         + 1.40% TableScanIterator::Read       
     0.76% unlikely                
+    6.38%     0.45%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] futex_wait        
+    5.88%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] Buf_fetch_normal::get 
+    5.76%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] lock_rec_lock       

可以看到多线程数据插入时候,在无主键的情况下频繁的索引分裂影响性能,所以导致性能劣化严重

那么有自增主键的情况下性能是什么情况呢?

看一下有自增主键的情况下性能情况,在有自增主键的时候与上面无主键的性能瓶颈处差不多,但是没有那么严重的频繁的索引分裂的性能问题。

+   10.16%     0.67%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::trylock         
+    9.25%     0.03%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] trx_undo_report_row_operation     
+    8.49%     0.31%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] futex_wait        
+    7.77%     0.00%  mysqld   libstdc++.so.6.0.32  [.] 0x00007ffff7958793    
+    7.59%     0.17%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] rw_lock_debug_mutex_exit 
-    7.30%     6.87%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] unlikely          
     6.58% start_thread            
        pfs_spawn_thread           
        handle_connection          
        do_command                 
        dispatch_command           
        dispatch_sql_command       
        mysql_execute_command      
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute       
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute_inner 
        Query_expression::execute  
      - Query_expression::ExecuteIteratorQuery 
         - 5.01% Query_result_insert::send_data  
            - 5.00% write_record   
                 handler::ha_write_row         
               - ha_innobase::write_row        
                  - 4.99% row_insert_for_mysql 
                     - row_insert_for_mysql_using_ins_graph               
                        - 4.96% row_ins_step   
                           - row_ins           
                              - 4.95% row_ins_index_entry_step            
                                 - 4.91% row_ins_index_entry              
                                      row_ins_clust_index_entry           
                                    - row_ins_clust_index_entry_low       
                                       - 2.63% btr_cur_optimistic_insert  
                                          - 1.35% page_cur_tuple_insert   
                                               0.67% page_cur_insert_rec_low  
                                          - 0.87% btr_cur_ins_lock_and_undo   
                                               0.59% trx_undo_report_row_operation        
                                       - 1.22% btr_pcur_t::open           
                                            1.20% btr_cur_search_to_nth_level 
                                       - 0.55% btr_cur_pessimistic_insert 
                                          - 0.55% btr_page_split_and_insert   
                                               0.51% page_validate        
         + 1.57% TableScanIterator::Read       
+    7.06%     0.03%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] mtr_t::commit     
+    7.02%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_validate      
+    7.01%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_pool_validate_instance    

我们知道对自增主键插入新数据时,是先获取一个区段锁,这样可以避免频繁持锁造成的性能劣化。而无显式定义主键表(其他可用于聚集索引的非空唯一索引也没有)时,会采用实例级的 DB_ROW_ID 作为该表的聚集索引,这个 DB_ROW_ID 每插入一行都需要请求加锁,因此会比自增主键表更加耗时。所以上面可以看到无主键表的多线程插入性能反而比单线程劣化。

2、接着调查有主键的情况下宽表造成性能劣化的情况。用perf查看造成性能劣化的瓶颈在哪里。

+   12.66%     0.05%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] do_syscall_64     
-   12.65%    12.30%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ut_delay                                       
   - 7.46% start_thread            
        pfs_spawn_thread           
        handle_connection          
        do_command                 
        dispatch_command           
        dispatch_sql_command       
        mysql_execute_command      
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute       
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute_inner 
        Query_expression::execute  
      - Query_expression::ExecuteIteratorQuery 
         - 7.27% Query_result_insert::send_data  
              write_record         
              handler::ha_write_row            
              ha_innobase::write_row           
              row_insert_for_mysql 
              row_insert_for_mysql_using_ins_graph 
              row_ins_step         
              row_ins              
              row_ins_index_entry_step         
              row_ins_index_entry  
              row_ins_clust_index_entry        
            - row_ins_clust_index_entry_low    
               - 4.53% btr_pcur_t::open        
                  - btr_cur_search_to_nth_level  
                     - 2.52% mtr_t::sx_lock    
                          rw_lock_sx_lock_gen  
                        - pfs_rw_lock_sx_lock_func 
                           + 2.52% rw_lock_sx_lock_func                   
                     - 1.85% buf_page_get_gen  
                        - 1.84% Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::single_page  
                           - 1.81% Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::mtr_add_page  
                                rw_lock_s_lock_gen 
                                rw_lock_s_lock_func                       
                                rw_lock_s_lock_spin                       
                                ut_delay       
               - 2.07% btr_height_get          
                    btr_root_block_get         
                    btr_block_get  
                    btr_block_get_func         
                  - buf_page_get_gen           
                     - 2.06% Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::single_page     
                        - 2.05% Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::mtr_add_page 
                             rw_lock_s_lock_gen  
                             rw_lock_s_lock_func 
                             rw_lock_s_lock_spin 
                             ut_delay          
                 0.50% btr_cur_optimistic_insert 
- 4.85% 0x7ffff7958793          
      - 4.70% std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> > >::_M_run
           std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> >::operator()
           std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> >::_M_invoke<0ul, 1ul, 2ul>
           std::__invoke<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>         
           std::__invoke_impl<void, Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>  
           Detached_thread::operator()<void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>  
           std::_Bind<void (*(unsigned long))(unsigned long)>::operator()<, void>         
           std::_Bind<void (*(unsigned long))(unsigned long)>::__call<void, , 0ul>        
           std::__invoke<void (*&)(unsigned long), unsigned long&>        
         - std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*&)(unsigned long), unsigned long&> 
            - 4.53% io_handler_thread          
               - fil_aio_wait      
                  - 4.14% buf_page_io_complete 
                     - 1.48% buf_flush_write_complete                     
                        - 1.48% mutex_enter_inline<PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> > >
                             PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::enter 
                             TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::enter         
                             TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::spin_and_try_lock 
                             TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::is_free       
                             ut_delay          
                     - 1.38% ibuf_merge_or_delete_for_page                
                        - 1.19% ibuf_bitmap_get_map_page                  
                             buf_page_get_gen  
                             Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::single_page     
                             Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::mtr_add_page    
                             rw_lock_x_lock_gen  
                             pfs_rw_lock_x_lock_func                      
                             rw_lock_x_lock_func 
                             ut_delay          
                     - 1.04% mutex_enter_inline<PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> > > 
                          PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::enter  
                          TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::enter            
                          TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::spin_and_try_lock    
                          TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::is_free          
                          ut_delay                                                 
+   12.57%     0.41%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] x64_sys_call      
+    9.93%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_validate      
+    9.91%     0.06%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_pool_validate_instance        
+    9.73%     0.11%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] __x64_sys_futex   
+    9.72%     0.30%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] rw_lock_debug_mutex_enter         
+    9.61%     0.13%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] do_futex          
+    8.23%     0.03%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] TableScanIterator::Read 
+    8.20%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] handler::ha_rnd_next  
+    8.17%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ha_innobase::rnd_next 
+    8.17%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ha_innobase::general_fetch        
+    8.08%     0.05%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] row_search_mvcc   
+    7.75%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_page_t::Latching_rules_helpers::assert_latches_let_distinguish 
+    7.71%     0.03%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_page_t::is_io_fix_write       
+    7.41%     0.04%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ut::Stateful_latching_rules<buf_io_fix, 3ul>::assert_latches_let_distinguish 
+    7.10%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] btr_cur_optimistic_insert         
+    6.98%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] Buf_fetch_normal::get 
+    6.76%     0.29%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::trylock
+    6.50%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::mtr_add_page
+    6.15%     0.04%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ut::Stateful_latching_rules<buf_io_fix, 3ul>::assert_latches_let_distinguish
+    6.11%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ut::Stateful_latching_rules<buf_io_fix, 3ul>::can_leave
+    5.92%     0.27%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] futex_wait        
+    5.89%     0.11%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] rw_lock_debug_mutex_exit 
+    5.89%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] btr_block_get     
+    5.88%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] btr_block_get_func    
+    5.74%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] rw_lock_s_lock_func   
+    5.50%     0.01%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::enter
-    5.49%     4.80%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] unlikely          
   - 3.89% start_thread            
        pfs_spawn_thread           
        handle_connection          
        do_command                 
        dispatch_command           
        dispatch_sql_command       
        mysql_execute_command      
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute       
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute_inner 
        Query_expression::execute  
      - Query_expression::ExecuteIteratorQuery 
         - 3.37% Query_result_insert::send_data  
              write_record         
              handler::ha_write_row            
              ha_innobase::write_row           
              row_insert_for_mysql 
              row_insert_for_mysql_using_ins_graph 
              row_ins_step         
              row_ins              
            - row_ins_index_entry_step         
               - 3.33% row_ins_index_entry     
                    row_ins_clust_index_entry  
                  - row_ins_clust_index_entry_low  
                     - 1.34% btr_pcur_t::open  
                        - 1.34% btr_cur_search_to_nth_level               
                             0.87% page_cur_search_with_match             
                     - 1.26% btr_cur_pessimistic_insert                   
                          1.19% btr_page_split_and_insert                 
         + 0.52% TableScanIterator::Read       
     0.90% 0x7ffff7958793          
     0.69% unlikely                                           

可以看到除了上面第一点提到的索引分裂的影响外,还增加了页分裂以及页读写相关的 I/O 操作影响性能,宽表情况下对于读写性能比短数据更加依赖机器的性能和配置,并且会随着写入数据的增加降低写入效率。

同样的,看看单线程情况下宽表的 perf 情况。

+    8.05%     0.02%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ut::Stateful_latching_rules<buf_io_fix, 3ul>::can_leave
+    7.95%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] mutex_enter_inline<PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> > >
+    7.81%     0.03%  mysqld   [kernel.kallsyms]    [k] x64_sys_call      
-    7.50%     7.50%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] ut_delay          
   - 7.41% 0x7ffff7958793          
      - 7.36% std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> > >::_M_run
           std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> >::operator()
           std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> >::_M_invoke<0ul, 1ul, 2ul> 
           std::__invoke<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>         
           std::__invoke_impl<void, Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>  
           Detached_thread::operator()<void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>  
           std::_Bind<void (*(unsigned long))(unsigned long)>::operator()<, void>         
           std::_Bind<void (*(unsigned long))(unsigned long)>::__call<void, , 0ul>        
           std::__invoke<void (*&)(unsigned long), unsigned long&>        
         - std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*&)(unsigned long), unsigned long&> 
            - 7.34% io_handler_thread          
                 fil_aio_wait      
               - buf_page_io_complete          
                  - 5.01% buf_flush_write_complete 
                       mutex_enter_inline<PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> > >   
                       PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::enter 
                       TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::enter               
                       TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::spin_and_try_lock   
                       TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::is_free             
                       ut_delay    
                  - 1.25% ibuf_merge_or_delete_for_page                   
                       ibuf_bitmap_get_map_page  
                       buf_page_get_gen        
                       Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::single_page           
                       Buf_fetch<Buf_fetch_normal>::mtr_add_page          
                       rw_lock_x_lock_gen      
                       pfs_rw_lock_x_lock_func 
                       rw_lock_x_lock_func     
                       ut_delay    
                  - 1.08% mutex_enter_inline<PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> > >    
                       PolicyMutex<TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy> >::enter 
                       TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::enter               
                       TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::spin_and_try_lock   
                       TTASEventMutex<GenericPolicy>::is_free             
                       ut_delay    
+    7.30%     0.04%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] buf_page_t::Latching_rules_helpers::assert_latches_let_distinguish 
+    4.37%     0.00%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] Fil_system::flush_file_spaces     
-    4.14%     3.88%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] unlikely                                                                                            
   - 2.75% start_thread            
        pfs_spawn_thread           
        handle_connection          
        do_command                 
        dispatch_command           
        dispatch_sql_command       
        mysql_execute_command      
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute       
        Sql_cmd_dml::execute_inner 
        Query_expression::execute  
      - Query_expression::ExecuteIteratorQuery 
         - 2.46% Query_result_insert::send_data  
              write_record         
              handler::ha_write_row            
              ha_innobase::write_row           
              row_insert_for_mysql 
              row_insert_for_mysql_using_ins_graph 
              row_ins_step         
            - row_ins              
               - 2.44% row_ins_index_entry_step  
                  - 2.41% row_ins_index_entry  
                       row_ins_clust_index_entry 
                     - row_ins_clust_index_entry_low                      
                        - 0.97% btr_pcur_t::open 
                           - btr_cur_search_to_nth_level                  
                                0.55% page_cur_search_with_match          
                        - 0.80% btr_cur_pessimistic_insert                
                             0.70% btr_page_split_and_insert              
   - 1.13% 0x7ffff7958793          
      - 1.02% std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> > >::_M_run
           std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> >::operator() 
           std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long> >::_M_invoke<0ul, 1ul, 2ul> 
           std::__invoke<Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>         
           std::__invoke_impl<void, Detached_thread, void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>  
           Detached_thread::operator()<void (*)(unsigned long), unsigned long>  
           std::_Bind<void (*(unsigned long))(unsigned long)>::operator()<, void>         
           std::_Bind<void (*(unsigned long))(unsigned long)>::__call<void, , 0ul>        
           std::__invoke<void (*&)(unsigned long), unsigned long&>        
         - std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*&)(unsigned long), unsigned long&> 
            - 0.70% io_handler_thread          
               - fil_aio_wait      
                  - 0.65% buf_page_io_complete 
                       buf_flush_write_complete  
                       dblwr::write_complete   
                       Double_write::write_complete                       
                       fil_flush_file_spaces   
                       Fil_system::flush_file_spaces                      
                     - Fil_shard::flush_file_spaces                       
                        + 0.65% Fil_shard::acquire            
+    3.97%     0.58%  mysqld   mysqld               [.] Fil_shard::flush_file_spaces

对比多线程和单线程的堆栈信息,可以看到多线程下抢 I/O 资源情况变严重,同时索引分裂和页分裂更严重,要花更多时间进行页位置比较、计算数据占用的空间和插入,另外由于抢锁导致多线程性能劣化更严重。

三、问题解决方案

通过上面分析发现,要想保证多线程插入速度比单线程快需要满足一定的条件:

  1. 目标表有主键,当主键列没有设置自增属性的情况下,每个线程间的主键值需要是离散且单个线程内主键值需要连续,这是为了保证索引插入的性能最高。比如线程1主键值为[1-1000],线程2主键值为[10000-11000],线程3主键值为[30000-31000]这样排列效率会比[1-3000]分三个线程高很多。
  2. 如果目标表主键是自增主键的话,因为无法定义自增主键的值,只能按照插入时候确定键值,因此自增主键会比非自增主键多线程离散值性能慢,但是因为自增主键持有的是区段锁,因此不会频繁持锁方面性能又会比非自增主键好。实际使用的时候还是要看源表的数据分布情况以及目标表结构来决定要怎么分配多线程的插入主键值。
  3. 目标表是宽表时,从上面的测试数据来看单行数据超过 520Bytes 多线程就开始劣化了,因此多线程插入只针对窄表有效。

四、问题总结

一般我们都认为多线程插入数据肯定比单线程插入快,但是通过本次的测试和分析可以看到实际情况需要结合数据库参数配置、索引、存储页以及磁盘的 I/O 性能等一起看,还要看源表主键值分布情况和目标表的表结构,并不是所有多线程插入都能产生更好的效果节省时间,有时候反而可能多线程比单线程更耗时间以及资源。


Enjoy GreatSQL

标签:Binlog,insert,lock,t1,GreatSQL,ins,mysqld,多线程,row
From: https://www.cnblogs.com/greatsql/p/18310838

相关文章

  • 白骑士的C++教学实战项目篇 4.3 多线程网络服务器
    系列目录上一篇:白骑士的C++教学实战项目篇4.2学生成绩管理系统        在这一节中,我们将实现一个多线程网络服务器项目,通过该项目,我们将学习套接字编程的基础知识以及如何使用多线程处理并发连接。此外,我们还将实现一个简单的客户端来与服务器进行通信。项目简介......
  • Java多线程入门
    创建线程的三种方式继承Thread类classMyThreadextendsThread{@Overridepublicvoidrun(){for(inti=0;i<100;i++){System.out.println(getName()+""+i);}}publicstaticvoidmain(String[]args......
  • 多线程三-线程安全之可见性与有序性
    volatile关键字来确保线程间的可见性,可以利用线程可见性在某些场景进行无锁化编程。下载Hotspot源码:官网:https://openjdk.org/左侧菜单,SourceCode下面的Mecurial点击jdk8点击hotspot点击zipvolatile关键字来确保线程间的可见性,可以利用线程可见性在某些场景进行无锁化......
  • Java中的并发数据结构与多线程优化技术
    Java中的并发数据结构与多线程优化技术大家好,我是微赚淘客系统3.0的小编,是个冬天不穿秋裤,天冷也要风度的程序猿!在多线程编程中,并发数据结构和优化技术是提高系统性能和可靠性的关键。Java提供了丰富的并发数据结构和多线程优化技术,本文将详细介绍常用的并发数据结构及其使用方法......
  • 学习日志:多线程
    文章目录前言一、多线程的优点二、单核CPU支持Java多线程单核CPU同时运行多个线程的效率三、线程安全四、死锁产生死锁的四个必要条件:检测死锁预防和避免线程死锁前言并发与并行并发:两个及两个以上的作业在同一时间段内执行。并行:两个及两个以上的作业在......
  • Java开发手册中-避免Random实例被多线程使用、多线程下Random与ThreadLoacalRandom性
    场景Java中使用JMH(JavaMicrobenchmarkHarness微基准测试框架)进行性能测试和优化:https://blog.csdn.net/BADAO_LIUMANG_QIZHI/article/details/131723751参考以上性能测试工具的使用。Java开发手册中有这样一条:【推荐】避免Random实例被多线程使用,虽然共享该实例是线程......
  • Java - 多线程
    ThreadLocalhttps://www.cnblogs.com/fsmly/p/11020641.html为了线程安全,每个线程改的都是自己本地的副本,从而不会影响其它线程。多线程访问同一个共享变量的时候容易出现并发问题,特别是多个线程对一个变量进行写入的时候,为了保证线程安全,一般使用者在访问共享变量的时候需要......
  • Java多线程:wait/notify机制-实现生产者消费者(4)
    ......
  • java八股复习指南-多线程篇
    多线程线程的实现在Java中,实现多线程的主要有以下四种继承Thread类,重写run()方法;实现Runnable接口,实现run()方法,并将Runnable实现类的实例作为Thread构造函数的参数target;实现Callable接口,实现call()方法,然后通过FutureTask包装器来创建Thread线程;......
  • Linux多线程
    目录一、认识线程1.1线程的概念1.2线程vs进程1.3地址空间详解二、线程函数 2.1pthread_create 线程创建函数2.2pthread库的引入2.3pthread_exit线程退出函数2.4pthread_cancel线程退出函数2.5 pthread_join线程等待函数2.6pthread_detach线程分离......