首页 > 其他分享 >lightdb fdw性能测试

lightdb fdw性能测试

时间：2022-11-06 13:56:34浏览次数：86  
标签：rows lightdb .. zjh fdw 测试 employee id postgres

首先造测试表和数据，

[zjh@hs-10-20-30-193 ~]$ ltsql -p23456 postgres
ltsql (13.8-22.3)
Type "help" for help.

zjh@postgres=# CREATE USER fdw_user WITH ENCRYPTED PASSWORD 'secret';
CREATE ROLE
zjh@postgres=# create table employee (id int, first_name varchar(20), last_name varchar(20));
CREATE TABLE
zjh@postgres=# insert into employee values (1,'jobin','augustine'),(2,'avinash','vallarapu'),(3,'fernando','camargos');
INSERT 0 3
zjh@postgres=# GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON TABLE employee TO fdw_user;
GRANT
zjh@postgres=# create extension postgres_fdw;
CREATE EXTENSION
zjh@postgres=# CREATE SERVER hr 
zjh@postgres-#  FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw
zjh@postgres-#  OPTIONS (dbname 'postgres', host '127.0.0.1', port '23456');
CREATE SERVER
zjh@postgres=# CREATE USER MAPPING for zjh     
SERVER hr
OPTIONS (user 'fdw_user', password 'secret');
CREATE USER MAPPING
zjh@postgres=# CREATE FOREIGN TABLE employee_fdw
(id int, first_name character varying(20), last_name character varying(20))
SERVER hr
OPTIONS (schema_name 'public', table_name 'employee');
CREATE FOREIGN TABLE

测试直接访问：

zjh@postgres=# select * from employee;
 id | first_name | last_name 
----+------------+-----------
  1 | jobin      | augustine
  2 | avinash    | vallarapu
  3 | fernando   | camargos
(3 rows)

Time: 0.222 ms
zjh@postgres=# select * from employee;
 id | first_name | last_name 
----+------------+-----------
  1 | jobin      | augustine
  2 | avinash    | vallarapu
  3 | fernando   | camargos
(3 rows)

Time: 0.213 ms
zjh@postgres=# select * from employee;
 id | first_name | last_name 
----+------------+-----------
  1 | jobin      | augustine
  2 | avinash    | vallarapu
  3 | fernando   | camargos
(3 rows)

Time: 0.251 ms

测试FDW，

zjh@postgres=# select * from employee_fdw;
 id | first_name | last_name 
----+------------+-----------
  1 | jobin      | augustine
  2 | avinash    | vallarapu
  3 | fernando   | camargos
(3 rows)

Time: 0.541 ms
zjh@postgres=# select * from employee_fdw;
 id | first_name | last_name 
----+------------+-----------
  1 | jobin      | augustine
  2 | avinash    | vallarapu
  3 | fernando   | camargos
(3 rows)

Time: 0.502 ms
zjh@postgres=# select * from employee_fdw;
 id | first_name | last_name 
----+------------+-----------
  1 | jobin      | augustine
  2 | avinash    | vallarapu
  3 | fernando   | camargos
(3 rows)

Time: 0.542 ms

可以发现，小数量差了一半多，都快0.3ms了。

造更多数据测试，

zjh@postgres=# insert into employee select id, 'firstname','lastname' from generate_series(4,100000) id;
INSERT 0 99997
zjh@postgres=# select count(1) from employee;
 count  
--------
 100000
(1 row)

Time: 5.340 ms
zjh@postgres=# select count(1) from employee;
 count  
--------
 100000
(1 row)

Time: 5.463 ms

zjh@postgres=# select count(1) from employee_fdw;
 count  
--------
 100000
(1 row)

Time: 5.714 ms
zjh@postgres=# select count(1) from employee_fdw;
 count  
--------
 100000
(1 row)

Time: 5.887 ms

zjh@postgres=# explain select count(1) from employee;
                           QUERY PLAN                            
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=16.88..16.89 rows=1 width=8)
   ->  Seq Scan on employee  (cost=0.00..15.50 rows=550 width=0)
(2 rows)

Time: 0.319 ms
zjh@postgres=# explain select count(1) from employee_fdw;
                     QUERY PLAN                     
----------------------------------------------------
 Foreign Scan  (cost=108.53..152.69 rows=1 width=8)
   Relations: Aggregate on (employee_fdw)
(2 rows)

Time: 0.258 ms
------------可知，聚合发生在远程，如果执行超过1ms，性能差异就没有那么明显了

再增加数据量，

zjh@postgres=# insert into employee select id, 'firstname','lastname' from generate_series(100001,1000000) id;
INSERT 0 900000
Time: 520.054 ms
zjh@postgres=# explain analyze select count(1) from employee a, employee b where a.id=b.id;
                                                                QUERY PLAN                                                                 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=10832577.83..10832577.84 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=714.154..714.155 rows=1 loops=1)
   ->  Merge Join  (cost=89752.00..9298263.80 rows=613725612 width=0) (actual time=317.340..680.131 rows=1000000 loops=1)
         Merge Cond: (a.id = b.id)
         ->  Sort  (cost=44876.00..45751.87 rows=350350 width=4) (actual time=160.142..224.013 rows=1000000 loops=1)
               Sort Key: a.id
               Sort Method: external merge  Disk: 13792kB
               ->  Seq Scan on employee a  (cost=0.00..9873.50 rows=350350 width=4) (actual time=0.008..66.685 rows=1000000 loops=1)
         ->  Materialize  (cost=44876.00..46627.75 rows=350350 width=4) (actual time=157.192..294.172 rows=1000000 loops=1)
               ->  Sort  (cost=44876.00..45751.87 rows=350350 width=4) (actual time=157.189..223.590 rows=1000000 loops=1)
                     Sort Key: b.id
                     Sort Method: external merge  Disk: 13792kB
                     ->  Seq Scan on employee b  (cost=0.00..9873.50 rows=350350 width=4) (actual time=0.008..62.933 rows=1000000 loops=1)
 Planning Time: 0.069 ms
 Execution Time: 718.328 ms
(14 rows)

Time: 718.736 ms

zjh@postgres=# explain analyze select count(1) from employee_fdw a, employee_fdw b where a.id=b.id;
                                                                 QUERY PLAN                                                                  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=1495.53..1495.54 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=1655.846..1655.848 rows=1 loops=1)
   ->  Merge Join  (cost=732.29..1388.59 rows=42778 width=0) (actual time=1344.306..1620.665 rows=1000000 loops=1)
         Merge Cond: (a.id = b.id)
         ->  Sort  (cost=366.15..373.46 rows=2925 width=4) (actual time=635.747..700.207 rows=1000000 loops=1)
               Sort Key: a.id
               Sort Method: external merge  Disk: 13792kB
               ->  Foreign Scan on employee_fdw a  (cost=100.00..197.75 rows=2925 width=4) (actual time=0.194..539.362 rows=1000000 loops=1)
         ->  Sort  (cost=366.15..373.46 rows=2925 width=4) (actual time=708.552..765.006 rows=1000000 loops=1)
               Sort Key: b.id
               Sort Method: external sort  Disk: 17664kB
               ->  Foreign Scan on employee_fdw b  (cost=100.00..197.75 rows=2925 width=4) (actual time=0.178..538.436 rows=1000000 loops=1)
 Planning Time: 0.080 ms
 Execution Time: 1660.944 ms
(13 rows)

Time: 1661.433 ms (00:01.661)
-------------------------查询没有被pushdown，性能相差就很大了，翻倍多，多了一次网络传输

增加条件就可以做pushdown，如下：

zjh@postgres=# explain (verbose,analyze) select count(1) from employee_fdw a join employee_fdw b on a.id=b.id and b.last_name='lastname' and a.last_name='last_name';
                                                                                          QUERY PLAN                                                                                      
     
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
 Foreign Scan  (cost=100.00..194.84 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=54.915..54.916 rows=1 loops=1)
   Output: (count(1))
   Relations: Aggregate on ((public.employee_fdw a) INNER JOIN (public.employee_fdw b))
   Remote SQL: SELECT count(1) FROM (public.employee r1 INNER JOIN public.employee r2 ON (((r1.id = r2.id)) AND ((r2.last_name = 'lastname'::text)) AND ((r1.last_name = 'last_name'::text
))))
 Planning Time: 0.099 ms
 Execution Time: 55.160 ms
(6 rows)

Time: 55.634 ms
zjh@postgres=# select count(1) from employee_fdw a join employee_fdw b on a.id=b.id and b.last_name='lastname' and a.last_name='lastname';
 count  
--------
 999997
(1 row)

Time: 452.738 ms

分页查询10,20,30行，

zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee where id =10;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(1 row)

Time: 48.984 ms

zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee_fdw where id =10;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(1 row)

Time: 45.413 ms

zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee where id>10 and id<20;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(9 rows)

Time: 53.922 ms
zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee_fdw where id>10 and id<20;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(9 rows)

Time: 53.075 ms


zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee where id>10 and id<30;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(19 rows)

Time: 56.326 ms

zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee_fdw where id>10 and id<30;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(19 rows)

Time: 53.293 ms

创建索引测试，

zjh@postgres=# create index idx_emp on employee (id);
CREATE INDEX
Time: 307.286 ms
zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee_fdw where id>10 and id<20;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(9 rows)

Time: 0.826 ms

zjh@postgres=# select version() from employee where id>10 and id<20;
                                                  version                                                  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
 LightDB 13.8-22.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(9 rows)

Time: 0.319 ms
zjh@postgres=# explain verbose select version() from employee_fdw where id>10 and id<20;
                                    QUERY PLAN                                    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Foreign Scan on public.employee_fdw  (cost=100.00..161.58 rows=17 width=32)
   Output: version()
   Remote SQL: SELECT NULL FROM public.employee WHERE ((id > 10)) AND ((id < 20))
(3 rows)

Time: 0.364 ms
-- 本质上还是序列化、反序列化问题

https://www.percona.com/blog/parallel-commits-for-transactions-using-postgres_fdw-on-postgresql-15/

https://www.percona.com/blog/2018/08/21/foreign-data-wrappers-postgresql-postgres_fdw/

https://www.percona.com/blog/2021/06/02/postgres_fdw-enhancement-in-postgresql-14

标签：rows,lightdb,..,zjh,fdw,测试,employee,id,postgres
From： https://www.cnblogs.com/zhjh256/p/16862297.html

相关文章

  • thread同步测试
    任务说明1.编译运行附件中的代码，提交运行结果截图，并说明程序功能2.修改代码，把同步资源个数减少为3个，把使用资源的线程增加到（你的学号%3+4）个，编译代码，提交修改后的代码......
  • thread同步测试
    一、任务要求：编译运行附件中的代码，提交运行结果截图，并说明程序功能修改代码，把同步资源个数减少为3个，把使用资源的线程增加到（你的学号%3+4）个，编译代码，提交修改后的代码......
  • thread同步测试
    1.编译运行附件中的代码，提交运行结果截图，并说明程序功能代码：#include<stdio.h>#include<pthread.h>#include<stdlib.h>#include<semaphore.h>#defineNUM5i......
  • MyBatis框架快速入门-搭建环境，编写代码，测试。
    MyBatis框架快速入门1入门案例案例的结构如下：MyBatis开发准备搭建MyBatis开发环境，实现第一个案例2使用Mybatis准备下载mybatishttps://github.com/mybati......
  • 测试框架搭建
    1、新建一个module，在pom.xml中新增如下内容：<properties><maven.compiler.source>8</maven.compiler.source><maven.compiler.target>8</maven.compiler.target></......
  • Python自动化测试工具Selenium
    Python能发挥作用的领域太多了，包括web开发、爬虫、自动化测试、大数据分析、机器学习与深度学习。今年我们来玩玩Python在web自动化领域的应用。SeleniumWithPython中文......
  • pgpool ii在lightdb下的性能测试
    1、从https://www.pgpool.net/下载最新版pgpoolii，如4.3.2。2、假设安装了postgresql或lightdb，百度一搜即可3、解压包，执行./configure &&make&&makeinstall4、修......
  • 测试也应该具备的项目管理能力
    转载：https://www.cnblogs.com/imyalost/p/16560084.html前几天在技术交流群有同学问到：“需求不明确&测试时间不足，经常加班，交付质量也不太好，该如何处理”？群里其他同学很热......
  • 测试脚本
    #!/bin/bashBIN=/path/to/your/vasp/executablermWAVECARSUMMARY.diaforiin5.15.25.35.45.55.65.7;docat>POSCAR<<!cubicdiamond$i......
  • 测试流程如何落地？
    转载：https://www.cnblogs.com/imyalost/p/16380505.html  前段时间公众号后台有粉丝留言问了一个问题：作为测试leader，该如何落地测试流程？这个问题初看很简单，落地流程......

赞助商

阅读排行

网站主页关于我们联系我们网站地图

本网站内容转载自其他媒体，侵权联系[admin##ips99.com]。

Copyright © 2020-2023 IPS99 版权所有 IPS99