首页 > 其他分享 >07 33984 Management Education and Learning B

07 33984 Management Education and Learning B

时间:2024-07-26 17:53:04浏览次数:12  
标签:Management 07 career Very professional follow Education your subject

Assignment Remit

Programme Title

Business Management suite of programmes

Module Title

Management Education and Learning B

Module Code

07 33984

Assignment Title

Resit – Coursework 2: Reflective piece

Level

LC

Weighting

20%

Hand Out Date

-

Due Date & Time

8th August 2024

 12 (Noon)

Feedback Post Date

TBC

Assignment Format

Essay

Assignment Length

500 words excluding references

Submission Format

 Online

Individual

Assignment:

Reflective essay on career development and narrative including the production of a CV/or online professional profile

The objective of this coursework is for you to critically engage with some theory and practice around career development and narratives, to draw implications for your own personal and professional development.

For this assignment, you need to undertake the following tasks:

  • If you have not done so already, produce a CV or online professional profile as part of the learning activities for week 11 of the module;
  • If you have not done so already, produce some creative visual material [a drawing or a collage] reflecting your career aspiration and values;
  • Assess your career aspirations as expressed in your collage or creative visual against Schein’s career anchors theory or the type of career you aspired to against one of the models of careers discussed in week 10;
  • Based on this, reflect on any existing or further professional development activities that you have done/may need to undertake to build-up your CV and align with your career anchors or the type of career that you aspire to.

The word count for this assignment is 250 words maximum excluding your reference list. When submitting your coursework, you need to include a copy of the CV or professional profile you produced as part of the learning activities for week 11 as well as a copy of the drawing or other visual material on your career aspiration that you produced as part of seminar 5 in two appendices to your assignment. It is important to note that we won’t assess the quality of your CV or the visual material that you produced per se but only your reflection on doing these. If you don’t submit a copy of your CV produced during week 11 and/or the creative visual you produced for seminar 5, points will be deducted from your grades

Module Learning Outcomes:

  • LO 1.Conduct a case study analysis and discuss, identify and assess responsible business practices and ways to enhance them at an individual level within organisations.
  • LO 2.Identify appropriate sources of data, start to practice research and analysis using various academic and secondary data sources.
  • LO 3.Demonstrate engagement with own personal, academic and professional development activities and planning within the context of Management Education and Learning;
  • LO 4.Understand what reflective practice is and apply it to own personal, academic and professional development.

Feedback to Students:

Both Summative and Formative feedback is given to encourage students to reflect on their learning that feed forward into following assessment tasks. The preparation for all assessment tasks will be supported by formative feedback within the tutorials/seminars. Written feedback is provided as appropriate.  Please be aware to use the browser and not the Canvas App as you may not be able to view all comments.

Use of Generative AI:  

Unless explicitly stated otherwise, students should assume that the use of generative AI within an assessment or assignment is not permitted.  Any assessment submitted that is not a student’s own work, including that written by generative AI tools, are in breach of the University’s Code of Practice on Academic Integrity (https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/as/registry/policy/conduct/plagiarism/index.aspx

Wellbeing Extenuating Circumstances:

The process for Extenuating Circumstances is to support students who have experienced unforeseen issues that have impacted their ability to engage with their studies and/or complete assessments. Students should notify Wellbeing of any extenuating circumstances as soon as possible via the online form, following the guidance provided.

https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/social-sciences/college-services/wellbeing/index.aspx

Marking criteria & referencing

The assessment for this module is based on the School assessment marking criteria available in Table 1 below. Please study the criteria carefully before you write your assignments, and consult them regularly while you are writing. In particular, writing assignments should concentrate on argument and analysis rather than description, and build on the material discussed in class. Please proof-read your work before submitting it and make sure that you reference properly all the material used in your essay – have a look here on the guidance on how to reference properly any work you use and cite within your essay.

Table 1: Grading Criteria:

 

80+

70-79

60-69

50-59

40-49

30-39

Below 30

Understanding

An original argument that shows independence and clarity of thought and is based on an excellent grasp of the subject

Develops a consistent, logical argument based on good understanding of the subject

Demonstrates a sound grasp of the subject. Arguments are sustained and generally convincing

Basic elements of the subject are demonstrated but misses some key points

Weak argumentation. Key ideas are unclear in places. Some misunderstanding of the subject is shown

Many basic areas of misunderstanding of the subject are shown

Virtually no understanding of the subject

Structure

Fluent and readable

Clear and easy to follow. Well signposted throughout. Convincing links are made between sections

Clear and easy to follow. Well signposted throughout.

Somewhat formulaic and repetitive in places. Links between sections unclear.

Fragmented in places and difficult to follow

Very limited ability to structure an argument, generally difficult to follow

Disorganized, fragmented, impossible to follow

Evidence

Excellent synthesis of relevant theories and examples. Demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge of the research literature, including classic as well as current debates

Based on solid research evidence, including journal articles as well as textbook sources. Very good use of examples

Goes beyond textbook sources to engage with relevant journal articles on the topic. Good use is made of examples

Some attempt at synthesis and analysis shown but arguments are inconsistent and not fully developed.

Very little research evidence to support arguments. Heavy reliance on lecture content and basic textbook sources

Predominantly descriptive rather than analytical. Contains numerous sweeping generalisations and unsupported assertions

Virtually no research evidence used, very speculative and heavily opinionated

Reflection

The analysis subjects underlying assumptions about the subject to critical scrutiny. Demonstrates a high level of reflexivity, including an ability to analyse personally-held beliefs and values

Very good awareness of different perspectives in shaping the subject. Some awareness of the author’s values and experiences in shaping their views on the subject is also shown

Some critical analysis of the subject is shown and the role of the author’s values and experiences is mentioned but not developed.

Demonstrates some awareness of different approaches and a willingness to go beyond basic managerialist and functionalist approaches

Very little awareness of different approaches

Uncritical and prescriptive in tone. Predominantly managerialist and functionalist in orientation.  No awareness of multiple perspectives on the subject

Little or no evidence of critical reflection

Style

Excellent, technically free from errors. Flawlessly referenced using Harvard method.

Clearly and fluently written. Very well referenced using Harvard method.

Generally well expressed, but with a few errors. Very well referenced using Harvard method.

Adequately expressed, but with some grammatical and spelling errors. Referenced using Harvard method but with omissions and errors

Unclear, difficult to follow in places. Not adequately referenced.

Very unclear, difficult to follow in many places. Poorly referenced.

Difficult to understand most points. Spelling, grammar and language weak. Little or no referencing provided

 

标签:Management,07,career,Very,professional,follow,Education,your,subject
From: https://www.cnblogs.com/vx-codehelp/p/18325925

相关文章

  • 2024-07-26 闲话
    在看老友记的过程中,感受到了常用词对语言理解的重要性。尤其是在听说过程中,需要人们快速反应,可以利用的context非常有限,一旦理解错了idiom,那么会对后面的交互产生较大障碍最近刷了一些quora,也是一样的感觉。但是文字模态实在是比语音模态好多了,阅读时有足够长的上下文和足够......
  • 0726鲜花—高一回忆录&&大事之后
    从HL回到了大连,天气是很舒适的,享受着一年一次的美好0725的正能量大会,回到了廿四,只是,或许早已经物是人非?不知不觉,我们也已经在廿四摸爬滚打整整一年我想到这永恒的一年,永恒到无法改变7月,我以不错的成绩被廿四录取8月,军训使我初识廿四和同学,我认识了勤,川,但还没有结识当时还有些......
  • 20240726【省选】模拟
    破防了,什么SCOI2024Day1翻版,一道题可能拿100pts,一道题大多数人拿10pts,还有一道不可做,队线110/lhT1去他妈的煞笔构史题解,说了跟说了一样。这个是真的不会。容易想到对二进制每一位开一颗权值线段树或者别的啥维护,然后我就不会了……考虑将每颗权值线段树对应处理的区间......
  • 20240726模拟赛订正题笔记
    (T1)lnsyoj2212刷数组考场上切掉了,所以来说说考场上的做法。首先看数据范围,线段树并不能拿满分,所以考虑在数组上操作。如何处理区间覆盖:记录一下区间覆盖的数,然后记录第几次覆盖,单点修改或增加时查看次数被覆盖了几次,若与正常覆盖次数不符,则将此数设为新的覆盖数。考场代码如下......
  • 2024-07-26 定义一个vue组件,并使用双向绑定该组件的值
    我写了一个input组件(vue3)<template><div><inputclass="inp":value="modelValue"@input="$emit('update:modelValue',$event.target.value)"/></div></template&......
  • leetcode周赛407
    A.使两个整数相等的位更改次数ac代码:classSolution{public:intminChanges(intn,intk){inta[40]={0},b[40]={0};for(inti=0;i<32;i++)a[i]=n>>i&1;for(inti=0;i<32;i++)b[i]=k>>i&1;i......
  • 题解:P10721 [GESP202406 六级] 计算得分(未成功)
    博客食用更佳:Myblog题目传送门分析:这道题是一个标准的dp。我们可以先预处理多个\(\texttt{abc}\)连成的字符串的最大值,之后可以按最长平台的方法处理。步骤:初值:这题不需要赋值,因为题目保证得分是正的,故初值为\(0\)。状态:\(dp_i\)表示连续\(i\)个\(\texttt{abc......
  • 盖世计划-0724-B班模拟 C. 游戏 (game)
    首先,Alice先去\(n\)个商店中购买物品。其中第\(i\)个商店售卖编号为\(i\)的物品,且每个物品的售价为\(a_i\)。Alice的总花费不能超过\(k\)。接着,Bob再去另外\(m\)个商店中购买物品。其中第\(i\)个商店售卖编号为\(n+i\)的物品,且每个物品的售价为\(1\)。Bob的......
  • 设计模式C++007__抽象工厂方法模式
    设计模式C++007__抽象工厂方法模式抽象工厂方法1、动机:在软件系统重,经常面临着“一系列相互依赖的对象”的创建工作;同时,由于需求的变化,往往存在更多系列对象的创建工作。?如何应对这种变化?如何绕过常规的对象创建方法(new),提供一种封装机制,来避免客户程序和这种“多系列具体对象......
  • Metasploit Pro 4.22.2-2024071901 (Linux, Windows) - 专业渗透测试框架
    MetasploitPro4.22.2-2024071901(Linux,Windows)-专业渗透测试框架Rapid7Penetrationtesting,releaseJul19,2024请访问原文链接:https://sysin.org/blog/metasploit-pro-4/,查看最新版。原创作品,转载请保留出处。作者主页:sysin.org世界上最广泛使用的渗透测试框架......