Nginx VS Traefik Comparison
https://reverseproxy.com/docs/comparison/nginx-vs-traefik/#:~:text=In%20summary%2C%20Nginx%20might%20be%20better%20for%20more,of%20configuration%20and%20automatic%20service%20discovery%20are%20needed.
Use as Reverse Proxy or Load Balancer:
- In static environments where the backend servers don’t change often, Nginx is a popular choice as a reverse proxy and load balancer due to its efficiency and performance.
- For dynamic environments (such as microservices architectures), Traefik is generally more effective because it can automatically update its configuration as services are added or removed.
- Nginx can also be a great fit when a high degree of customization is required in routing, handling requests, and performance tuning.
- Traefik can shine in scenarios where modern protocols are heavily used, and native support for HTTP/2, GRPC, automatic SSL, real-time metrics, and tracing can be beneficial.
Conclusion:
In summary, Nginx might be better for more static setups or when high customizability and performance are required. Traefik would be a better choice for dynamic, containerized environments where ease of configuration and automatic service discovery are needed. It’s worth noting that both can be used together, with Nginx serving static content as a web server and Traefik being used as a reverse proxy and load balancer.
标签：Comparison,used,Traefik,environments,Nginx,VS,static,where From： https://www.cnblogs.com/lightsong/p/18299551